Islamic State’s Environmental War Crimes in Iraq.

 

IRAQ

As we drive up, the desolate farm in the shadow of north-western Iraq’s Sinjar mountain looks like many others in the area. The farmhouse is abandoned, the fields are barren. A neighbour, curious about our visit, wanders over and explains that the owner used to grow olives, wheat, and vegetables. But, like half of the farmers in this village, he and his family haven’t returned since fleeing from the armed group calling itself Islamic State (IS) four years ago. Why? One clue is the large water tank near the farm’s irrigation well: empty. Another is the lengths of plastic irrigation pipes nearby: broken and scattered. On closer inspection, the entrance to the irrigation well is stained with oil, with oil stains also visible in and around ruptures in the black plastic irrigation pipe leading from the well. Oil doesn’t spontaneously appear in irrigation wells in this part of Iraq. This farm, and many others like it, are war crime scenes. Iraq declared military victory over IS just over a year before our visit, but the effects of this conflict are still clearly evident. Sinjar district was home to much of Iraq’s Yezidi community before 2014. It was also the site of many of IS’s most brutal crimes. IS fighters rounded up and killed the men and boys who hadn’t been able to seek sanctuary on Sinjar Mountain, then abducted and sold an estimated 6,000 young women and children into slavery elsewhere in Iraq and in Syria. These crimes made headlines around the world. What is less well-known is that, when IS was forced to retreat, its fighters took to eviscerating the landscape in ways that gave no immediate military advantage. According to a detailed Amnesty International investigation, IS deliberately targeted the rural environment that underpins Yezidi farmers’ livelihoods.


Some of the clearest examples of IS’s deliberate, wanton destruction are related to irrigation wells like those we witnessed on that desolate farm in Sinjar. These wells were often sabotaged with rubble, oil, or other foreign objects. As one water engineer explained, “I am quite sure it was intentional: these sorts of items do not end up in the borehole or well pipes unless they are placed there.” Blockage was often accompanied by theft and/or destruction of the pump, cables, generators, and transformers. According to local officials, 400 of 450 irrigation wells in one sub-district alone were put out of use.

Sinjar district is one of the driest areas in the world where agriculture can be practised. IS’s destruction of irrigation wells in the area is widespread and has far-reaching consequences. As a local agricultural official told us, “The worst thing is when you destroy a well: the trees and crops will die, the rest of the farm dies too... IS’s goal was to destroy the resources of a people that depend on crops and livestock.” Destruction of an adversary’s property not required by military necessity constitutes a war crime. Such acts may also be crimes against humanity, targeting the Yezidis and other rural communities in Iraq. With a UN investigative team already collecting evidence of IS crimes in Iraq, efforts to hold IS responsible for crimes under international law should, where sufficient evidence exists, include these specific crimes.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Highlighting Rapidly Growing Links between Climate and Conflict

Encourage the entire international and bilateral donor community to recognize and address environmental crime.

Climate and security: environmental impact of armed conflict and climate-driven security risks.